When future Nobel laureate Saul Bellow published Seize the Day in 1956, it was immediately greeted by critics to be a book that proved Bellow’s artistic maturity. Seize the Day is a sobering book about a man and his struggle with inner demons and his efforts to recognize his existence in the world. Indeed, the odds are against Tommy Wilhelm who is going through an onerous middle life crisis; he is estranged from his wife and children, is at odds with his successful father, had a failed Hollywood career and unemployed with his finances in a mess. In fact, a Hollywood agent once described him as “The type that loses the girl”. As his life comes crashing down, we follow Wilhelm through the course of one day in which he tries to connect with his insular father and take one last shot at financial stability. Seize the Day is a grim, existentialist portrayal of a man who no longer connects with anybody around him and lives in the bitterest form of isolation. Bellow’s characterization of Wilhelm will serve to his readers as a warning about the failure to make mature decisions and a critique of the ruthless nature of modern society.
Bellows repeatedly stresses the fact that majority of the characters in Seize the Day judge Wilhelm by his financial state and ignore him as a human being and thus this book also serves as a critic of a society obsessed with money. A major portion of the early parts of the book focuses on the interactions between Wilhelm and his vain, successful father who had been living in an upscale hotel called the Gloriana Hotel in New York. Their relationship is odd with Wilhelm trying to reach out to his father while his fathers tries to distance himself from the troubles that his son is facing. Wilhelm’s frustration which stem from his inability to connect with his father are evident when he confesses to his father, “You have no sympathy. All you do is to shift the blame to me!” But his father rejects his every plea of help as he thinks that Wilhelm will become nothing but a burden to him. This is seen when he tells Wilhelm, “And I want nobody on my back. Get off! And I give you the same advice too. Carry nobody on your back.” Furthermore, Wilhelm’s state of affair leaves his father thinking that he is incompetent as seen in the moment where he remarks that, “I don’t understand your problems. I never had any like them.” Despite being estranged, his wife still holds him responsible for supporting her financially. In fact, Wilhelm’s wife views him nothing more than a distant bread winner as was seen during their conversation at the end of the book where she remarks, “I hate it when I have to ask you for the money that you owe us. I hate it!” Then comes the character of Tamkin who plays a pivotal role in the book. Tamkin claims to be a “Psychologist” and makes dubious claims at being a speculator. Tamkin is his last hope and his final desperate bid to reestablish himself, financially. The only reason that he would trust such an untrustworthy person is because he isn’t getting any sort of support from his family which judges him too harshly.
The more that Wilhelm defends himself throughout the book, the more he realizes that his immature nature is the cause of his suffering and not “luck” as he would like to keep it, in Sieze the Day, Saul Bellow tries to show that we are more responsible for our action more than luck or chance. This is reflected in his abrupt decision to drop out of college and pursue a career to Hollywood but never goes beyond being lost in a crowd full of extras. He had trusted the wrong talent scout. Despite repeated objections from his parents and friends he still went on to gamble his life away in a bid to become a star in Hollywood. Another realization of Wilhelm’s immaturity is the fact that it was he who left his wife and children and not the other way around. He fails to asserts himself over his vengeful wife and to fight over the guardianship of his children. Despite being far away from his family, he manages to comfort himself superficially by thinking that he is still supporting his children by sending them money. This incomplete withdrawal from family life is one of the reasons for his intense loneliness.
The rest of Seize the Day is an introspective journey where Wilhelm realizes his mistakes and his inability to change them is common to all of us. His attempts at restoring his life to normalcy are ruined after Tamkin cheats him out of his last savings. This is the turning point of the book in which Wilhelm performs the deepest type of soul searching. He accepts the blame for all the hurt he has given to people and no longer blames “luck” for his failings. This is reflected in the ending in which he confesses in an internal monologue, “What’ll I do? I’m stripped and kicked out…Oh Father! What do I ask of you ? What’ll I do about the kids – Tommy, Paul?” With these words, he ultimately accepts responsibility for his actions and his fate which he had been otherwise been placing it on other external factors.
All in all, Seize the Day is a haunting existentialist fable about a flawed man and the gradual acceptance of his flaws. It is a manifestation of our greatest fears; social alienation and inescapable loneliness. And it also acts as a bitter, although indirect, criticism of modern life and all its pressures. Even after more than fifty years since its publication, the themes of Seize the Day still resound strongly when I read it.